Discord Structure Changes
Proposed By
Essential Intent
Outcome
Proposal Date
May 17, 2022
Meeting Notes
Type
Last edited time
Jun 30, 2022
Meeting Notes:
Outcome: Passed ✅
Outcome Summary
It has been decided that discord management / structure changes do not need to be official proposals.
Proposal
- Tension:
- The Discord has (again) lost a lot of its order and logic, ao because people have now too?) many permissions and can move a lot around.
- With the creation of the GPC category + most of holdings moving into the DAO the ‘gitcoin core’ category has also become outdated
- Proposal:
- Townsquare*
- DAO Community*
- Public Goods
- FDD
- Moonshot Collective
- DAO Ops
- MMM
- GPC
- Hackathons & Events
- DCompass
- Govern Gitcoin
- Support*
- Gitcoin Local
- Data
- Archived
- Townsquare & Support are accessible for everyone on Level 1
- Why Townsquare at the start and not the end? Because it’s our townsquare (= our community), DAO Vibes also linked to this
- DAO Community is accessible to various levels within the DAO, Applicants, DAO Contributors and Core Contributors
- Rest is based on the order voted on by the core contributors during the Weekly WS call, where I mainly took into account the order of the workstreams.
- This role is manually assigned (for now), which can be done by anyone who has a ‘WS-lead’ role
- What used to be “gitcoin core” is now moved mostly under GPC, access is given with the role ‘GPC contributors’ and/or GPC leads
- Moving of remaining channels
- Team general (rebranded to DAO Core) —> DAO Community
- Holdings dao leadership (rebranded to CSDO Strategy) —> DAO Ops, access w/ role DAO Governance (=csdo)
- Designer sync → MMM
- Year in review → MMM
- Hiring (rebranded to dao-people-ops) → DAO Ops, access with DAO Core role
- Onboard to opolis —> archive (thread in people ops)
- Treasury management → archive (duplicate with dao treasury diversification under daoops)
- Gnosis-multisig → archive
1) To ratify the following order for the categories:
*The categories Townsquare, DAO Community & Support: These are placed at respectively the beginning & the end because they have leveled access.
Results of the vote for reference
2) To delete the Gitcoin Core category and repurpose the role Gitcoin Core (rebranded to DAO Core) = anyone with a +20hr role
Note: planned evolution & order for DAO Ops (!) 👇
- Clarifying Questions:
- Sean - New folks who have joined recently haven’t been able to see some MMM channel, so they’ve been given the mmm-contributor role to gain access. Has there been any role changes w/ in the MMM workstream?
- Kris - No, but Jonathan (CoachJ) has been in touch with Kris about all this
- Sean - ok maybe this is an issue with people coming on not getting that role as part of onboarding - one example is azeez from PGF couldn't see content channel, gave him mmm contributor role but that's not ideal for our tracking
- Chase - Do think we need to keep onboard to opolis? people are moving to the DAO still and will be important
- Lindsey - that's one of the channels i want to follow-up on Chase
- Tigress - if there were naming conventions for workstream-channels we could talk about them briefly here, otherwise, just do it
- Joe - we found that we needed an FDD visitor role so we don't ping non-contributors who need to see FDD channels when we don't mean to
- Kris - The gitcoin core role should fix this if they are core contributors
- Kris - Sean: this actually also counts for what you mentioned
- Kyle - Context setting for folks:
- Reactions:
- Kyle - Doesn’t need to be a proposal. If anyone disagrees, they should reach out to Kris specifically
- Kris - OK, will start executing on this in the coming days
- Amendments:
- N/A
- Objections?
- N/A
- Passed?
- Yes / Not a proposal