🗓️

WLI Weekly Gokhan #5

Status

Date

summary

I’ve shifted from a toxicity score to how they align on community values

Very specific projects

TogetherCrew

Changing existing ways of doing things

Online space, I left the telegram group because

Consumer pays for a solution - both sides 

What have you lost out on

Would pay for something that would help them manage what comes out of hand

Grant management - the whole process took a lot of time.

Hate speech monitoring for individuals, diffences:

Not pay as much

Might expect the tool to start working streigh away

Not need so much training data

Adopt as fast as you can

Is there a way for people with a similar profile be able to pull togethert their data for fine tuning?

At what point do we know an individual is willing to pay for this?

People who are just using social, might be less willing to pay for something connected to their work

Mental health protection they would be paying - perpective AI

For taking part in improving AI, reducing biases

Would be used for reporting and research - ideal value exchange

Datasets - Custumize the sensibility

There was a competition, comparing two sentences, which one is more toxic?

You can then train / score hate speech

Easier to ask people to add more data

Alternative

Ways for the model that can be speech

Roberta LLMs model

Comments

Can I personally be a force for good for the community?

Greedy investor

Components thats are tradeable - models and data trained for ppl need to work with

Can be used in scoring and scanning model

Virtue signaling / how to remove the language thart will be seen

There was the loss project being more toxity and moderation

Move away from consulting to go and use

Innovation they would still pay for this

Moderation where you have and you dont have it, not central but personal

We are nbtio sensoring and people can say whatever they want

🗓️

WLI Weekly Gokhan #5

Status

Date

summary

I’ve shifted from a toxicity score to how they align on community values

Very specific projects

TogetherCrew

Changing existing ways of doing things

Online space, I left the telegram group because

Consumer pays for a solution - both sides 

What have you lost out on

Would pay for something that would help them manage what comes out of hand

Grant management - the whole process took a lot of time.

Hate speech monitoring for individuals, diffences:

Not pay as much

Might expect the tool to start working streigh away

Not need so much training data

Adopt as fast as you can

Is there a way for people with a similar profile be able to pull togethert their data for fine tuning?

At what point do we know an individual is willing to pay for this?

People who are just using social, might be less willing to pay for something connected to their work

Mental health protection they would be paying - perpective AI

For taking part in improving AI, reducing biases

Would be used for reporting and research - ideal value exchange

Datasets - Custumize the sensibility

There was a competition, comparing two sentences, which one is more toxic?

You can then train / score hate speech

Easier to ask people to add more data

Alternative

Ways for the model that can be speech

Roberta LLMs model

Comments

Can I personally be a force for good for the community?

Greedy investor

Components thats are tradeable - models and data trained for ppl need to work with

Can be used in scoring and scanning model

Virtue signaling / how to remove the language thart will be seen

There was the loss project being more toxity and moderation

Move away from consulting to go and use

Innovation they would still pay for this

Moderation where you have and you dont have it, not central but personal

We are nbtio sensoring and people can say whatever they want