2025 May 16
Summary
Transitioning Transparency: A Weekly Check-In
In this community call for the Black Flag DAO, dated May 16th, 2025, members, including Richard, Brian, Droste, Coffee Crusher, and others, discuss a variety of internal governance issues. Topics include transitioning from the old Multisig and Transition Council, the importance of finding mutual meeting times across different time zones, and the critical debate around the transparency of public versus private discussions. A significant focus is placed on resolving the ongoing 'op payment' issue involving prior voting and trust within the community. Additionally, the call touches on potential operational enhancements, such as leveraging AI for documentation and note-taking, and highlights a broader reflection on similar challenges faced by other DAOs, such as Arbitron. There's a commitment among the participants to maintain openness and transparency in their processes to better serve the community.
Timestamps
00:00 Introduction and Apologies
00:44 Community Call Kickoff
01:38 Flag Keepers' Updates
03:21 Discussion on Multisig Transition
04:40 Transparency and Public Discussions
06:14 Conflict of Interest Concerns
09:06 Private vs Public Deliberations
14:20 OP Payment Controversy
26:46 Focus on Multisig Handover
29:23 Open Meetings and Audience Participation
31:00 Managing Off-Topic Conversations
32:47 Using AI for Meeting Summaries
34:13 Scheduling the Next Podcast Meeting
35:55 Forum Post and Funding Requests
37:06 Scam Concerns and Discord Security
43:50 Challenges in DAO Governance
45:20 Arbitrum Governance Controversy
53:12 Summarizing and Communicating Meeting Discussions
55:01 Conclusion and Next Steps
Claude AI summary
Black Flag DAO Community Call Summary - May 16, 2025
Overview
The Black Flag DAO (BFD) community call took place on Friday, May 16, 2025, with participants including Thriller, r_kusti, Droste, CoffeeCrusher, and BrianL. The meeting covered several key topics including the transition of the Multisig to new Flag Keepers, the "OP situation" regarding payments that were previously declined, and discussions about transparency in DAO governance.
Key Topics Discussed
Multisig Transition
- NF Thinker is leading coordination with former Multisig members to transfer control
- The process will require multiple transactions to add all seven new Keepers
- The first transaction requires 4 of 7 signatures from the former Multisig
- Progress is being made with help from former Multisig member Rowan
The "OP Situation"
- A contentious issue regarding payments that were previously approved by community vote but declined by the former Multisig
- The new Flag Keepers discussed whether they should honor these payments once they gain control
- Multiple Flag Keepers expressed support for making the previously approved payments
- There was consensus to focus first on getting Multisig control transferred before addressing the OP payments
Transparency in Governance
- BrianL raised concerns about private Flag Keeper discussions mimicking the previous Transition Council's approach
- Discussion about which conversations should be public versus private
- Strong consensus among call participants for more transparency and public discussions
- Agreement that transaction signing coordination should be done publicly
Other Topics
- Issues with the outdated Bankless DAO forum still being accessible and receiving spam posts
- Discussion of similar governance challenges in other DAOs, particularly Arbitrum's current situation
- Brief discussion about podcast planning between Thriller and Droste
DM Groups vs. Public Discussions
Pros of Private DMs
- Allows for discussion of personal scheduling constraints that aren't everyone's business
- May be more efficient for purely administrative tasks
- Can provide space for initial thoughts before public presentation
Cons of Private DMs
- Reduces transparency and community trust
- Creates "broken conversations" when discussions are fragmented
- Repeats patterns from previous leadership that members disliked
- Doesn't align with DAO values of openness and decentralization
- Community can't provide input or oversight
Community Consensus
The call participants strongly favored public discussions, with CoffeeCrusher suggesting "everything goes in public unless there's a very specific reason it needs to be private." The group felt that coordination for signing transactions should be in public channels, as the community had no visibility into when the former Multisig was signing transactions.
Actionable Items
- Create a Flag Keepers poll to gauge support for paying the previously declined OP transactions
- Prioritize completing the Multisig transition before addressing the OP payments
- Move Flag Keeper discussions from private DMs to public channels (with exceptions for personal scheduling matters)
- Use AI to summarize this discussion about public/private conversations for other Flag Keepers
- Establish a weekly summary of community calls to be posted on the forum
- Schedule podcast planning meeting for Tuesday, May 20th at 11 AM Pacific
- Disregard/remove the spam post on the outdated Bankless forum
The call demonstrated a commitment to transparency and a desire to avoid repeating governance mistakes from the past, with participants agreeing that default public conversations would better serve the DAO's values and community trust.
Transcript