🗃️
Contributor Access Bundle DBs
/
Move accounting (Contributor payment administration) & legal squads into DAOops

Move accounting (Contributor payment administration) & legal squads into DAOops

Proposed By
Essential Intent
Outcome
PASSED
Proposal Date
Oct 26, 2021
Meeting Notes
Type
Structure
Last edited time
Jul 25, 2022
Meeting Notes:
Outcome: Passed ✅
Outcome Summary
This proposal passed, and accounting & legal squads will move into the DAO Ops workstream.
Proposal
  • Proposal 2 - Move accounting (Contributor payment administration) & legal squads into DAOops [Joe]
    • Example from FDD Q3 accounting - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TnXswN7_sneWgc-kElibr-MQVqTOoA5iTgjxwtNUuu4/edit?usp=sharing
    • Tension: would be beneficial to separate execution in FDD, because this is not just FDD only but DAOOps
    • Clarifications
      • Kris: Fulltime or not? Christine would go fulltime on this. Legal: two of them are official contribs
      • Loie: Is this about hiring or not? No, Christine is hired by FDD. Should the squads move into DAOOps. Would be good to move operational pieces here.
      • Kyle: Will the funding for these squads then also move out of this? All of that ops budget would move to the crossstream DAO.
    • Reactions
      • Kris: wait until next Q
      • Kyle: supportive of this proposal. this will need work & handoff from joe.
      • Alp: in support of this
      • Chrisdean: going to require coordination so doing it in crossdao ops makes sense. just consider timing on when's best to put big effort into coordinating
      • Armand: support this, not much to say, not much work to be done since budget already in place, we can just fork the budget in place
      • Brittney: seems like it needs to happen, but if it's not time sensitive then why wouldn't we just wait til next quarter?
      • QZ: would like to agree on common accounting standard, that would be cool to add to proposal
      • Fred: agree with QZ, standard
      • Loie: support this proposal.
      • Kevin: supports it, no comments
      • Linh: opt out since 1st week back
      • Huxwell: support! Moonshot was also trying to figure out compensation stuff, would like to have more than 1 lead for this stream. maybe we shouldn't have a lead for this WS, or if we do maybe it should be a founder of gitcoin
      • Kish: agree with Joe, but i don't understand the complete complexity of shifting it from 1 stream to another
    • Integration: let's take it at the speed that the workstream participants relevant to this shift can best do it
    • Objections? Proposal Passed!
🗃️
Contributor Access Bundle DBs
/
Move accounting (Contributor payment administration) & legal squads into DAOops

Move accounting (Contributor payment administration) & legal squads into DAOops

Proposed By
Essential Intent
Outcome
PASSED
Proposal Date
Oct 26, 2021
Meeting Notes
Type
Structure
Last edited time
Jul 25, 2022
Meeting Notes:
Outcome: Passed ✅
Outcome Summary
This proposal passed, and accounting & legal squads will move into the DAO Ops workstream.
Proposal
  • Proposal 2 - Move accounting (Contributor payment administration) & legal squads into DAOops [Joe]
    • Example from FDD Q3 accounting - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TnXswN7_sneWgc-kElibr-MQVqTOoA5iTgjxwtNUuu4/edit?usp=sharing
    • Tension: would be beneficial to separate execution in FDD, because this is not just FDD only but DAOOps
    • Clarifications
      • Kris: Fulltime or not? Christine would go fulltime on this. Legal: two of them are official contribs
      • Loie: Is this about hiring or not? No, Christine is hired by FDD. Should the squads move into DAOOps. Would be good to move operational pieces here.
      • Kyle: Will the funding for these squads then also move out of this? All of that ops budget would move to the crossstream DAO.
    • Reactions
      • Kris: wait until next Q
      • Kyle: supportive of this proposal. this will need work & handoff from joe.
      • Alp: in support of this
      • Chrisdean: going to require coordination so doing it in crossdao ops makes sense. just consider timing on when's best to put big effort into coordinating
      • Armand: support this, not much to say, not much work to be done since budget already in place, we can just fork the budget in place
      • Brittney: seems like it needs to happen, but if it's not time sensitive then why wouldn't we just wait til next quarter?
      • QZ: would like to agree on common accounting standard, that would be cool to add to proposal
      • Fred: agree with QZ, standard
      • Loie: support this proposal.
      • Kevin: supports it, no comments
      • Linh: opt out since 1st week back
      • Huxwell: support! Moonshot was also trying to figure out compensation stuff, would like to have more than 1 lead for this stream. maybe we shouldn't have a lead for this WS, or if we do maybe it should be a founder of gitcoin
      • Kish: agree with Joe, but i don't understand the complete complexity of shifting it from 1 stream to another
    • Integration: let's take it at the speed that the workstream participants relevant to this shift can best do it
    • Objections? Proposal Passed!