🗃️
Contributor Access Bundle DBs
/
Confirm CSDO attendance and ensure representation from other key drivers of the DAO

Confirm CSDO attendance and ensure representation from other key drivers of the DAO

Proposed By
Essential Intent
Outcome
AMENDED
Proposal Date
Mar 8, 2022
Meeting Notes
Type
Agreement
Last edited time
Jul 28, 2022
Meeting Notes:
Outcome: Passed with amendments ✅🛠
Outcome Summary
This proposal passed, and formal representation will be allowed for:
  • Holdings (with expiration, pending MSA terms)
  • Foundation
  • MSC, FDD, dCompass, DAO Ops, MMM, PGF
Proposal
Proposal 1 - kyle
  • Tension: Membership of CSDO is murky given the changes with the workstreams and org coordination.
  • Proposal: The goal is to confirm attendance and that we have representation from other key drivers of the DAO
    • Allow formal representation from:
      • Holdings
      • Foundation
      • MSC, FDD, dCompass, DAO Ops, MMM, PGF
  • Clarifying Questions:
    • Owocki: what is changing exactly? remove dgrants & add foundation. K: replaces dgitcoin/dcompass + foundation
  • Reactions:
    • Joe: Would we have transparency who is paid by WSs via the DAO as opposed to by Holdings so that there is clear representation from the workstreams and Holdings
    • Loie: Support this proposal. Appreciate this not being overly complex of a change. It’s not always important who gets paid by DAO vs holdings, can be a stability element.
    • Owocki: support proposal, matches the changes happening elsewhere. This is consent-based governance, not majority, so feels good. Irina is working on transition of funds, holdings seats could/should expire when the agreement expires.
    • Brittney: Support this. Natural progression of what should happen.
    • Annika: support. Feels like the right structure, need to review overtime re: thin workstreams. When we have 20 WSs, this won’t work anymore.
    • Huxwell: support. Reflects the changes.
    • Kris: Support - possibly keep as much as possible the same people as representatives. Best to keep the same people per WS to avoid 3 people to attend.
  • Amendment notes:
    • Changes: removing dGitcoin, adding dCompass, adding Foundation, Setting expiration for Holdings pending MSA terms.
    • Elegibility criteria might help here in a future proposal
  • Objections? No
  • Proposal passed!
🗃️
Contributor Access Bundle DBs
/
Confirm CSDO attendance and ensure representation from other key drivers of the DAO

Confirm CSDO attendance and ensure representation from other key drivers of the DAO

Proposed By
Essential Intent
Outcome
AMENDED
Proposal Date
Mar 8, 2022
Meeting Notes
Type
Agreement
Last edited time
Jul 28, 2022
Meeting Notes:
Outcome: Passed with amendments ✅🛠
Outcome Summary
This proposal passed, and formal representation will be allowed for:
  • Holdings (with expiration, pending MSA terms)
  • Foundation
  • MSC, FDD, dCompass, DAO Ops, MMM, PGF
Proposal
Proposal 1 - kyle
  • Tension: Membership of CSDO is murky given the changes with the workstreams and org coordination.
  • Proposal: The goal is to confirm attendance and that we have representation from other key drivers of the DAO
    • Allow formal representation from:
      • Holdings
      • Foundation
      • MSC, FDD, dCompass, DAO Ops, MMM, PGF
  • Clarifying Questions:
    • Owocki: what is changing exactly? remove dgrants & add foundation. K: replaces dgitcoin/dcompass + foundation
  • Reactions:
    • Joe: Would we have transparency who is paid by WSs via the DAO as opposed to by Holdings so that there is clear representation from the workstreams and Holdings
    • Loie: Support this proposal. Appreciate this not being overly complex of a change. It’s not always important who gets paid by DAO vs holdings, can be a stability element.
    • Owocki: support proposal, matches the changes happening elsewhere. This is consent-based governance, not majority, so feels good. Irina is working on transition of funds, holdings seats could/should expire when the agreement expires.
    • Brittney: Support this. Natural progression of what should happen.
    • Annika: support. Feels like the right structure, need to review overtime re: thin workstreams. When we have 20 WSs, this won’t work anymore.
    • Huxwell: support. Reflects the changes.
    • Kris: Support - possibly keep as much as possible the same people as representatives. Best to keep the same people per WS to avoid 3 people to attend.
  • Amendment notes:
    • Changes: removing dGitcoin, adding dCompass, adding Foundation, Setting expiration for Holdings pending MSA terms.
    • Elegibility criteria might help here in a future proposal
  • Objections? No
  • Proposal passed!