📲

4/28 Call (Technical)

Zev & Zakk

Zev thinks the integration looks generally straightforward

Registering project = separate txn after created, just matter of building UI for this

for most part, voting strategy using Gitcoin’s payout strategy

vote takes place on the round

round calls voting method

that then calls mint on our actual contract

do all calc’s for voting strategy off-chain, emits an event, listen to the event off-chain & they do a round of analysis on all the votes that they vet are real

I’ve been less into this

can write voting strat & payout strat to make this pretty automated

we care less about these bots

submit the merkle to initiate the payout

how does the voting strat handle free nfts? those would be easiest to sybil attack; can we just exclude these from the voting strategy

should be no problem to look at events from directly minting on the contract so that we can check across a variety of interfaces

this is a human step but we can do it at least

on Decent.xyz frontend, it’s simple b.c. can just swap out the mint button so could be better to just listen for the minting event on the NFT contract itself

analysis as to whether something is a bot has to happen off-chain ⇒ I think we can maybe also just only count that NFTs are paid

when Gitcoin is calculating the matching pool, they only count votes with a passport score above a certain number

for first round, sybil defense not a huge issue; to start - ok to say it’s not our highest priority to run a perfectly defended round & then we can consider that down the road

switch to bi-weekly meeting

when we’re actually working on the implementation can then go back to weekly to make sure everything is

fairly new protocol so can give feedback on the ease of implementation

📲

4/28 Call (Technical)

Zev & Zakk

Zev thinks the integration looks generally straightforward

Registering project = separate txn after created, just matter of building UI for this

for most part, voting strategy using Gitcoin’s payout strategy

vote takes place on the round

round calls voting method

that then calls mint on our actual contract

do all calc’s for voting strategy off-chain, emits an event, listen to the event off-chain & they do a round of analysis on all the votes that they vet are real

I’ve been less into this

can write voting strat & payout strat to make this pretty automated

we care less about these bots

submit the merkle to initiate the payout

how does the voting strat handle free nfts? those would be easiest to sybil attack; can we just exclude these from the voting strategy

should be no problem to look at events from directly minting on the contract so that we can check across a variety of interfaces

this is a human step but we can do it at least

on Decent.xyz frontend, it’s simple b.c. can just swap out the mint button so could be better to just listen for the minting event on the NFT contract itself

analysis as to whether something is a bot has to happen off-chain ⇒ I think we can maybe also just only count that NFTs are paid

when Gitcoin is calculating the matching pool, they only count votes with a passport score above a certain number

for first round, sybil defense not a huge issue; to start - ok to say it’s not our highest priority to run a perfectly defended round & then we can consider that down the road

switch to bi-weekly meeting

when we’re actually working on the implementation can then go back to weekly to make sure everything is

fairly new protocol so can give feedback on the ease of implementation