πŸ’°

Grants Committee Weekly 22/09/23

Attendance
links, Icedcool, PaulitoBankless, OrnellaWeb3, Baer.eth
Date
Sep 22, 2023
Last Edited Time
Sep 25, 2023
Last edited by
Note-taker
Recording
Multi-select
Action Items
Create a new GC meeting time
Update GC multisig
Accounting
(links to fill in)
  • Bank for the remaining of the season: 7M BANK
Funding
Discussion
  • KPIs
    • Projects
    • Guild funding split for KPIs
      • Vote?
Β 
Split guild funding for S9?
@Baer.eth suggests we split guild funding similar to project funding (KPI-based, give them 50% up front and 50% later)
  • links is in general supportive, but believes it’s the wrong time
    • because it would be a surprise to guilds
    • because it would be a lot of additional work and we already have difficulty getting GC members to collect KPIs from projects
    • because I would rather spend the time reforming the grants process in general
  • ornella is supportive, but also not at this time because she is learning new processes already and is worried about adding processes to know
  • iced feels similarly
Β 
VOTE: Should we split Research Guild and Translator’s Guild S9 Funding by 50% based on reporting of KPIs (similar to projects)
Yes: Icedcool, links, Paulito, Baer.eth
No: Ornella
Abstain:
THIS MOTION PASSES
Β 
  • Gitcoin grants stack?
    • Use for general funding?
    Notes
    Β 
    πŸ’°

    Grants Committee Weekly 22/09/23

    Attendance
    links, Icedcool, PaulitoBankless, OrnellaWeb3, Baer.eth
    Date
    Sep 22, 2023
    Last Edited Time
    Sep 25, 2023
    Last edited by
    Note-taker
    Recording
    Multi-select
    Action Items
    Create a new GC meeting time
    Update GC multisig
    Accounting
    (links to fill in)
    • Bank for the remaining of the season: 7M BANK
    Funding
    Discussion
    • KPIs
      • Projects
      • Guild funding split for KPIs
        • Vote?
    Β 
    Split guild funding for S9?
    @Baer.eth suggests we split guild funding similar to project funding (KPI-based, give them 50% up front and 50% later)
    • links is in general supportive, but believes it’s the wrong time
      • because it would be a surprise to guilds
      • because it would be a lot of additional work and we already have difficulty getting GC members to collect KPIs from projects
      • because I would rather spend the time reforming the grants process in general
    • ornella is supportive, but also not at this time because she is learning new processes already and is worried about adding processes to know
    • iced feels similarly
    Β 
    VOTE: Should we split Research Guild and Translator’s Guild S9 Funding by 50% based on reporting of KPIs (similar to projects)
    Yes: Icedcool, links, Paulito, Baer.eth
    No: Ornella
    Abstain:
    THIS MOTION PASSES
    Β 
    • Gitcoin grants stack?
      • Use for general funding?
      Notes
      Β