Voyager Identity #7
Last Edited Time
Jun 13, 2022
Created time
Apr 14, 2022
Participants
Created By
Type
Created
Apr 14, 2022
Zoom Recording
Property
Property 1
Attendees
- Conner Swenberg
- Mendes
- David Sneider
- Balazs Nemethi
- Brian Petes
- Victor Leipnik
- Cent Hosten
- Josh Tan
- Aaron
Meeting Minutes
Revocation
Have the consumer of attestation determine if the attestation is acceptable within the expirey date.
BPetes
- Discussion about interesting combinations
Josh
- Let’s assume 24hr expiry dates
To Do
Develop the DAOIP page
- include the various sub WG contributions.
Clarify:
If the DAOs are publishing some form of data as a URI, is the issuers issuing a secondary attestation
We are thinking there there is some way of pointing to some place that says that this entity is attesting this data (could be a DAO or third party issuer)
More clarity about revocation and expiration
PII
You should never be attesting to names, but to membership
Schema can be extended, but they are not recommended
This might not be the most pure way of managing identity, but we believe this is a way forward at this time, and recommend limiting
Josh (proposal): Consensus? We’re defining this architecture for NON-PII information linked to an address or digital credential controlled by an end-user or DAO. We do NOT recommend extending the data model on your own.
We expect all extensions to fit a certain format and ensure that they are auditable to make sure that they are compliant for GDPR
We might be able to modularize this out of the standard in terms of specification
Formulate this part of the discussion into a question and pose it to Jimmy in the chat.