Council of Writers
Created
Created by
Type
Note-taker
Attendance
Meeting Date
‣
Last edited by
Last edited time
Feb 21, 2022
Detailed Notes
Person
Agenda
- Welcome
- Announcements
- New Member Intros
- T.W. Kaiser
- Written for several news outlets over past few years
- Has experience in marketing writing
- Recently founded own DAO and is launching token
- march.401
- Few years experience song writing
- Likes to write and pushes self to break boundaries
- Has written press releases and case studies
- Sheep2Moon
- Writes about project management?
- Looking for ways to contribute and collab
- Elemental is hosting a copywriting event and showing some key stuff 2/22/22 at 8am PST
- Discussion
- Good Morning News & Writers Guild Collaboration Proposal
- It’s an opportunity to write or do voice over on a daily basis
- there’s been a few more WG members over in the server
- S/O to tomahawk and ap0ll0
- Pub’s been working on smart contract tech and it’s phenomenal!!
- It’s a news reporting that updates daily
- Nonsense thinks all of what GMN is doing on-chain would be perfect for what the WG would like to do on-chain. This is a perfect marriage.
- ap0ll0 asked who will be included to receive the GMN subscription?
- We have over 400 people with the WG tag but only 69 Scribes. Are we going to include Scribblers as well? Ap0ll0 believes this should be a Scribe perk and only include Scribes.
- nonsense believes we should include Scribblers.
- A compromise could be to offer the free subscription to scribblers who submit to GMN and get published by GMN
- What are the next steps to ratify this proposal?
- Jake explained that there really isn’t a formal process worked out. We could def discuss this today on the governance call.
- Continued SubDAO discussion
- We’re already performing as a subDAO, just flying under Bankless Flag
- We can still fly the Bankless Flag even if we’re in our own server where we have more freedom and control
- we already have a multi-sig
- Links, hiro, Sid, and Ap0ll0 all believe that a subDAO is more than just having a multi-sig. It includes a governance token.
- Sid expressed that we could have our own governance token for voting and still use BANK for commerce or rewards
- Sam thinks a governance token is too much overhead. We would have to supply liquidity right?
- nonsense answered that we don’t have to have LP. We can just distribute tokens based on contributions.
- Tokenomics would have to be determined before we start trying to start our own governance token
- Ap0ll0 asked how we could use BANK for commerce, if we’re not in the DAO server?
- Links proposed a token swap.
- hiro was concerned about outside entities having governance control
- Jake asked if separate servers would hinder communications
- nonsense answered it wouldn’t hinder communication. we can still have a presence here in the DAO’s server, but we would ultimately work in a separate server
- links elaborated more on what nonsense was explaining