Strike Team #7
Last Edited Time
Apr 27, 2022
Created time
Dec 30, 2022
Participants
Created By
Type
Created
Dec 30, 2022
Zoom Recording
Property
Property 1
Attendees: 🌹 Josh, 🍫 Ido, ⚫ Zargham, 👫 Eyal , 🎆 Isaac
Observers: Lucia (Metagov)
Â
Goals
- Review
Minutes
- Decision: include a 1-to-many foreign-key to represent co-dependence of proposals [rejected]
- +1 Z, Eyal, this is useful
- -1 Josh, Ido, this isn’t important enough
- Decision: include a global uuid for proposals, but forces there to be an on-chain representation!
- Zargham: this forces it to have an on-chain representation
- Isaac: doesn’t necessarily need to be minted as a non-trasnferablet NFT, as long as it’s a reserved identifier. Maybe you could lazy mint a proposal?
- Eyal: in some real-world systems, you have a proposal that is moved from committee, to senate, to president, etc. That could be enabled through a “transferable NFT” function.
- -1 Ido: we should NOT make a uuid for proposals. All the logic for that chain of entities to approve it should live inside the contract, which also lives in a composition of DAOs, which in itself is a kind of DAO. A proposal that lives in two DAOs.
- Decision: should the standard respect the “DAO being composed of other DAOs / composite DAOs” operation / phenomenon?
- +1 Z: yes
- +1 Josh: yes
- ~? Ido: pretty open question though
- Decision: should the standard include / expose an events interface?
- TBD
- Next time: defining the execution. We will need to meet a few times before Jan. 7!!!
Action items
Ido + Isaac + Josh meeting on Monday to focus down execution.
Josh + Z: Membership + proposals first draft data model
Josh + Isaac + Bill W: Membership draft
Josh + Ido + Eyal + Z: Proposal draft
Events draft?
Previous Items
Josh + Z: Membership + proposals first draft data model
Josh + Isaac + Bill W: Membership draft
Josh + Ido + Eyal + Z: Proposal draft
Events draft?
Â
Â