Org Membership
Scrap current leveling system and the permissions it conveys in Discord
Ā
A āpermissioned shellā was suggested in the original outline. This means membership requirements.
ā£
Ā
The ā£ vote supported a two-level membership system.
Ā
- Full Membership
- Requires a soulbound token
- If we have soulbound governance tokens, these would have to be earned or gifted
- NFT token or ERC-20 token?
- The soulbind could work like the tlBANK NFT, where it can be transferred once
- Expires?
- Non-monetary, no economic value
- Requires some kind of Proof-of-Humanity validation
- We should not be too doxxy
- Any suggestions? GitHub? BrightID? WorldCoin? Phone number 2FA?
- Social consensus of current Stewards
- Need to have X amt of Contributor Token staked to maintain Full Membership
- Weāll need to develop staking a staking mechanism for the contributor token
- And also what advantage does staking it provide?
- Maintain a minimum token holding
- Stake to nominate new Full Members who hold X number of Contributor Token++ Requires three (3)Ā Full MembersĀ to take for Full Membership++ Released after X epochs
- Contributor Membership
- Requires staking of one (1) Full Member
- Requires X amt of Contributor Token
- Requires Membership Working Group approval
- Rage quit function w/ auto treasury triggers for Full Members
- Linksā idea about PoolTogether-type Treasury (buy membership, earn yield on amt contributed)
Ā
what if membership was checked and auto-updated regularly? e.g. soulbound seasonal/annual membership nfts/badges that can be blockchain referenced by something like collab.land.
Ā
Be gifted a time-limited guest pass or invite?
Maintain a smaller token holding requirement for the basic level membership?
Hold a different particular NFT?
Ā
Onboarding
How do we admit new members?
When do we admit new members?
What kind of people do we want to become members?
Do we use some kind of staking/referral system?
Users nominate new members
Users stake tokens to vouch for the new member
If the new member is determined by the community to be a bad actor, the stake gets slashed and claimed by the orgās treasury. If the new member joins as a full member, perhaps the referrer could also be incentivized with a reward. Gotta be careful not to incentivize onboarding for onboarding again.
Some stewards or some kind of human layer would vote whether to admit the nomination
Acts as a check and balance on unrestrained promotions like we saw with the L2 system
Ā