🗃️
Contributor Access Bundle DBs
/
Proposal to break out Community XP + Ops out of the FDD budget

Proposal to break out Community XP + Ops out of the FDD budget

Proposed By
Essential Intent
Outcome
Proposal Date
Oct 26, 2021
Meeting Notes
Type
Budget
Last edited time
Jul 25, 2022
Meeting Notes:
Outcome:
Outcome Summary
 
Proposal
  • Proposal 1 - Proposal to break out Community XP + Ops out of the FDD budget ( $40k (+$30k), $44k (+$21k) ) [Kevin]
  • Tension: Budget for onboarding & cross stream should be governed by those people
Options outlined in FDD Q4 Budget Proposal on Gov Forum
  • FDD estimated CSDG budget for Q4
    • Community XP - $40k (Up $30k from Q3. Does not include Kris or other salary amounts)
    • DAOops - $44k (Up $21k from Q3. Includes one FTE salary)
  • Clarifications
    • Joe: Who would be on the multisig and how can it represent each workstream fairly? What would be the process for legitimately updating participants?
    • Scott: What do we consider DAOOps vs Public Goods Funding related? How do we determine what's X-dao and what's not?
    • Loie: does this require having a separate multisig - ideally yes
    • Kris: PG funding WS its own WS? It would be good for reasons of legitimacy.
  • Reactions:
    • Huxwell: Multisig needs to be governed by representatives of all the WSs.
    • Scott: Remapping what should or should not belong under this. Eg devops should this belong under this?
    • Joe: cross stream dao ops overview was created by me, want to make clear FDD wouldn't be governing this. Options in its own stream, keep it here. If own stream, who will administer payments + designing what governance mechanisms are needed. Worries that if it's in another stream, not sure if it's more legitimate. Risk that this could lead to split offs in the dao and deeper disagreements.
    • Loie: Looks like we're creating a Workstream by itself. There could be some legal liabilities here. Support this proposal.
    • Alp: Proposal makes sense.
    • Fred: Gitcoin ambassadors how should they be funded, could become a part of this, this lives a bit apart atm
    • Armand: great idea to use separate multisig but maybe keep it as it is right now. Based on current model could continue work as it is now
    • Brittney: no comment
    • Kish: keeping as is.
    • Linh: no opinion
    • Chris: some context missing. efficiency component missing.
    • QZ: no feedback
    • Kris: there's been confusion about various cross stream ops activities (like pay) that would prob be solved by this proposal. i'm in favor of it having it's own multisig
  • Integration
    • Adding an LLC to counter liabilities
  • Objections: Maybe not do an LLC with this proposal
  • Proposal: 1 person per WS + XDAO decisions happen in this call - 3/5
    • Next:
🗃️
Contributor Access Bundle DBs
/
Proposal to break out Community XP + Ops out of the FDD budget

Proposal to break out Community XP + Ops out of the FDD budget

Proposed By
Essential Intent
Outcome
Proposal Date
Oct 26, 2021
Meeting Notes
Type
Budget
Last edited time
Jul 25, 2022
Meeting Notes:
Outcome:
Outcome Summary
 
Proposal
  • Proposal 1 - Proposal to break out Community XP + Ops out of the FDD budget ( $40k (+$30k), $44k (+$21k) ) [Kevin]
  • Tension: Budget for onboarding & cross stream should be governed by those people
Options outlined in FDD Q4 Budget Proposal on Gov Forum
  • FDD estimated CSDG budget for Q4
    • Community XP - $40k (Up $30k from Q3. Does not include Kris or other salary amounts)
    • DAOops - $44k (Up $21k from Q3. Includes one FTE salary)
  • Clarifications
    • Joe: Who would be on the multisig and how can it represent each workstream fairly? What would be the process for legitimately updating participants?
    • Scott: What do we consider DAOOps vs Public Goods Funding related? How do we determine what's X-dao and what's not?
    • Loie: does this require having a separate multisig - ideally yes
    • Kris: PG funding WS its own WS? It would be good for reasons of legitimacy.
  • Reactions:
    • Huxwell: Multisig needs to be governed by representatives of all the WSs.
    • Scott: Remapping what should or should not belong under this. Eg devops should this belong under this?
    • Joe: cross stream dao ops overview was created by me, want to make clear FDD wouldn't be governing this. Options in its own stream, keep it here. If own stream, who will administer payments + designing what governance mechanisms are needed. Worries that if it's in another stream, not sure if it's more legitimate. Risk that this could lead to split offs in the dao and deeper disagreements.
    • Loie: Looks like we're creating a Workstream by itself. There could be some legal liabilities here. Support this proposal.
    • Alp: Proposal makes sense.
    • Fred: Gitcoin ambassadors how should they be funded, could become a part of this, this lives a bit apart atm
    • Armand: great idea to use separate multisig but maybe keep it as it is right now. Based on current model could continue work as it is now
    • Brittney: no comment
    • Kish: keeping as is.
    • Linh: no opinion
    • Chris: some context missing. efficiency component missing.
    • QZ: no feedback
    • Kris: there's been confusion about various cross stream ops activities (like pay) that would prob be solved by this proposal. i'm in favor of it having it's own multisig
  • Integration
    • Adding an LLC to counter liabilities
  • Objections: Maybe not do an LLC with this proposal
  • Proposal: 1 person per WS + XDAO decisions happen in this call - 3/5
    • Next: