Prepare survey questions

Assign

Status

In Progress

Link

Type

Survey

Media

Deadline

Publication Date

Crypto Sapiens is preparing a Web3 Podcast Listener Survey to better understand who's out there listening. In the spirit of decentralization, we're going to share de-identified results publicly in a report and recruit select web3 podcasts to include in the survey + as a collaborative comarketing effort.

Any podcasts we include in the co-marketing campaign must be included on the survey question “Which Podcasts Do you Listen to?” so that we can segment the data into relevant audiences for each of the shows.

Incorporate questions from → https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScM9IluNeocoyEnBkmcRwzqKcdqUf--jRQR7IBJOJiJgRmHkQ/formResponse

“Hi hi. I've got a proposal for this working group.

Crypto Sapiens is preparing a Web3 Podcast Listener Survey (WPLS) to better understand who's out there listening. We're very inspired by the insightfulness of the questions on the DAO Contributors Sentiment Tracker (DCST) and would like to link data between respondents.

We could simply copy questions to our form and include them. However, this could also be an opportunity to increase the number of respondents on the DCST.

Would there be any possibility of sharing data if we include a very clear and explicit "OPT-IN" question on the WPLS asking if our survey respondents agree to allow their data to be shared & linked across both surveys using the email address they complete the forms with?

We would include the opt-in question along with a link to the DCST form at the end of our survey. This would potentially increase the number of respondents for this section of the WPLS by not requiring participants to do double data entry - while separately increasing the number of respondents on the DCST by attracting to survey participants.

I believe the benefit of collaboration outweighs the risk of losing WPLS participants during a  "transfer" between surveys and therefore I'm pitching this collaboration as a positive-sum win-win initiative. Thoughts?”

Prepare survey questions

Assign

Status

In Progress

Link

Type

Survey

Media

Deadline

Publication Date

Crypto Sapiens is preparing a Web3 Podcast Listener Survey to better understand who's out there listening. In the spirit of decentralization, we're going to share de-identified results publicly in a report and recruit select web3 podcasts to include in the survey + as a collaborative comarketing effort.

Any podcasts we include in the co-marketing campaign must be included on the survey question “Which Podcasts Do you Listen to?” so that we can segment the data into relevant audiences for each of the shows.

Incorporate questions from → https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScM9IluNeocoyEnBkmcRwzqKcdqUf--jRQR7IBJOJiJgRmHkQ/formResponse

“Hi hi. I've got a proposal for this working group.

Crypto Sapiens is preparing a Web3 Podcast Listener Survey (WPLS) to better understand who's out there listening. We're very inspired by the insightfulness of the questions on the DAO Contributors Sentiment Tracker (DCST) and would like to link data between respondents.

We could simply copy questions to our form and include them. However, this could also be an opportunity to increase the number of respondents on the DCST.

Would there be any possibility of sharing data if we include a very clear and explicit "OPT-IN" question on the WPLS asking if our survey respondents agree to allow their data to be shared & linked across both surveys using the email address they complete the forms with?

We would include the opt-in question along with a link to the DCST form at the end of our survey. This would potentially increase the number of respondents for this section of the WPLS by not requiring participants to do double data entry - while separately increasing the number of respondents on the DCST by attracting to survey participants.

I believe the benefit of collaboration outweighs the risk of losing WPLS participants during a  "transfer" between surveys and therefore I'm pitching this collaboration as a positive-sum win-win initiative. Thoughts?”