ALL
Voting databank and proposal Tracking
Name
🤓 Project Contributors
Date
Initiatives
Importance level
Voting choice
proposal date
Proof of Vote
Tags
link to proposal
Comments/ transprancy report
Aug 21, 2023
Yes
Aug 21, 2023
Aug 17, 2023
Yes
Aug 17, 2023
Aug 1, 2023
Yes
Aug 1, 2023
Jul 28, 2023
Yes
Jul 28, 2023
May 8, 2023
Accept
The proposal for the grants program was well written, feedback from the community was addressed, and it’s clear that the proposers intend to iterate the program over time. We look forward to seeing the SafeDAO grants program take flight.
Apr 14, 2023
Yes
Apr 14, 2023
We are in favor of this proposal since it offers clarity to the DAO and a positive way forward
Apr 14, 2023
Yes
1. We are in favor of this proposal since it offers clarity to the DAO and a positive way forwardMessage
Apr 14, 2023
Against
Apr 8, 2023
The legal contracts established by the foundation should be taken into account,
Didnt vote
Feb 26, 2023
YES
YES
Not voted yet
Raise the Snapshot quorum to 50k
No
The infrastructure for deploying Euler on BNB chain isn't available now; deploying promptly might lead to the allocation of extra resources from the stakeholders, with might lead to deprioritization of current development while trying to honour the snapshot vote
-
Yes
Euler is currently the got to the marketplace to ETH LSD; adding rETH will only boot the looping cycle. This change will not have a huge impact on the overall stability of Euler protocol.
NO
the proposal hasn’t provided Enough information on the potential impact of the change. In our opinion, the author has to inform the DAO sufficiently on proposals like changing default parameters.
Yes
Implementing such changes aligns with our vision for the DAO
No
According to our evaluation, this proposal shouldn’t be considered as an emergency proposal. No DAO funds are at Risk; the value of said tokens are $15K at the time of publishing the proposal. If not executed proposal the DAO is opening doors to many front-running opportunities.
Abstain (didnt vote)
the proposal to include a mandatory voting option to ‘Abstain’ failed to include Abstain. Furthermore, this proposal was derived from the DAOstewards ideation thread, thus deciding to abstain from voting.
Abstain
Yes
Yes
Dec 27, 2022
Dec 27, 2022
Abstain
Dec 20, 2022
We believe the bounty program for @encodeclub could bring value to Euler DAO and attract more developers to build on the Euler Protocol. However, the Proposers fail to underline who they are and lay critical indicators to measure if the programme is successful or keep the Encode club accountable. This might be because they have relied on their previous 'Rep' generated from high-profile events and hackathons. This added to the fact that Euler emerged from one of Encode hackathons.
our members have tried to influence the proposal before going for snapshot voting but those weren't considered in the proposal
1. @jengajojo's personal response
2. @0xBaer's personal response
Due to the circumstances mentioned earlier (i.e. potential benefits of the program due to the outreach and proven track record, on the other hand, lack of accountability measures)
Daostewards have decided to abstain from voting on the proposal.
Our known Delegators were commutated beforehand as soon as our internal poll ended.
Abstain
Dec 20, 2022
This was a varied position within the SAFE delegation, but ultimately we voted to abstain because of the way the proposal passed through the governance process. The proposal was pushed through the process as quickly as possible even when constructive feedback was given, and even when other proposals were currently in the pipeline in front of it. It could have benefited from some soft consensus and development, but it felt like the SAFE team wanted to get it on the books more than get the DAO involved.
Make no Changes
Nov 11, 2022
Approve
May 9, 2023
Yes
Mar 30, 2023
DAOstewards votes "Yes". We believe having value aligned protocols/partners have active governance participation is a great way to foster a healthy ecosystem, boost decentralized decision making and build towards a well coordinated future as an ecosystem.
Mar 31, 2023
For
Breaking the code of conduct for self-interest reasons is harmful for the ecosystem
Mar 22, 2023
Not Voted yet
Mar 22, 2023
Make no Changes
DAOstewards have voted ‘make no changes’ as we think the specifications proposed in the proposals are only amendable by large token holders and the core team. Community feedback isn't properly incorporated.
May 10, 2023
Yes
May 10, 2023
Reasonable budget for S4 to cover Intent #4: Governance Accessibility.
May 10, 2023
Yes
May 10, 2023
Reasonable Budget for season 4 to cover Intent #3: Spread Awareness of the Optimistic Vision.
May 10, 2023
Yes
May 10, 2023
well thought out budget for this Intent. the Grant Council has also been solid. we vote "Yes" on this proposal
Aug 16, 2023
For
Jul 6, 2023
A key element of of having a thriving and successful ecosystem is the need for constant innovation to push the boundaries of different types of applications that can be built on Optimism. This proposal reflects this and DAOstewards approves!
Mar 30, 2023
Yes
Mar 30, 2023
We agree that this is a positive change for the ecosystem and we support the proposal
Oct 19, 2023
For
Oct 12, 2023
Jul 6, 2023
Proposal 3B: Velodrome: Spread Awareness Through Direct Outreach and Onboarding
Proposal 3D: Create and Maintain the 'Optimism Vision Reservoir'
Proposal 3J: Web3xplorer - A curated web platform to discover useful web3 apps, resources and tools
Proposal 3I: ‘Thank Optimism - powered by ThriveCoin’
Proposal 3K: Rumbo Optimista - Hacia Ethereum Mexico The Event || Optimistic Road in the way to Ethereum México The Event
Proposal 3C: BanklessDAO’s Global Campaign to spread the Optimistic vision
Proposal 3A: Fueling RetroPGF Growth through Education, Collaboration, and Active Marketing
Proposal 3F: Let’s take the Optimistic Vision to LATAM with Espacio Cripto
Proposal 3G: Spread Optimistic values across Latam with Solow
Proposal 3E: Optimistic Womxn Shinning in Blockchain
Jul 6, 2023
Jul 6, 2023
Proposal 3C, Proposal 3D, Proposal 3I, Proposal 3J
Jul 6, 2023
May 25, 2023
Jack Anorak
May 25, 2023
Voted for Jack Anorak - he has the most forum activity among all candidates
May 25, 2023
Abstain
May 25, 2023
DAOsteward participating as candidate in this race so we abstain
May 25, 2023
No
May 25, 2023
DAOsteward shares Polynya sentiment on this proposal. find out here. https://gov.optimism.io/t/treasury-appropriation-proposal-foundation-year-2-budget/5979/4?u=thinkdecade
May 10, 2023
Yes
May 10, 2023
DAOsteward votes in favor of this proposal as we believe this is a well thought out budget to carry out various season 4 initiatives aimed at progressing the collective. We are excited to see how "collective Intents" will drive the Optimism ecosystem forward.
May 25, 2023
Yes
May 25, 2023
The Optimism token distribution hasn't followed the initial plan, there are less token distributed per the initial plan, adding more inflation does not help.
Aug 21, 2023
Yes
Aug 21, 2023
Feb 24, 2024
Against
Feb 24, 2024
DAOStewards is in support of this mandate as this presents an opportunity for the DAO to scale much more than it has right now. We are watching out for the follow-up proposal as it is important there are actionable plans set in stone to meet these goals.
Feb 17, 2024
Against
Feb 17, 2024
Partnerships are a very good way to grow and build lasting relationships within the web3 ecosystem but we believe that now is not a good time for this partnership as there seems to be some conflict of interest within the cryoDAO team. DAOStewards voted against this proposal.
Feb 17, 2024
For
Feb 17, 2024
DAOStewards have given the annual 2023 report a thorough review and we support the changes proposed by the Compensation Policy Squad. These updates provide more clarity with funding disbursements, and cutting down Stewards Vita token compensation by ~59% helps reduce that already high token supply. DAOStewards voted in favor of this proposal.
Feb 15, 2024
Against
Feb 15, 2024
Feb 14, 2024
Abstain
Feb 14, 2024
When this proposal dropped last time out, some clarifications were requested by the DAO. These weren’t still tended to so DAOStewards voted to abstain.
Feb 12, 2024
For
Feb 12, 2024
These proposed changes are highly welcome as it doesn’t affect the original model but add a layer of security. DAOStewards votes in favor of this proposal.
Feb 5, 2024
For
Feb 5, 2024
Feb 2, 2024
For
Feb 2, 2024
DAOStewards is in favor of this proposal.
Community Governance and Participation: By voting in favor, the VitaDAO community gains voting power to govern intellectual property (IP). This means active participation in decision-making regarding research and development, fostering a sense of community involvement and democratic governance within VitaDAO.
Jan 30, 2024
For
Jan 30, 2024
Immutable Lawyer for getting the wg going, Paval for his work at Plurality Labs, Benard for his work at UniSwap
Jan 11, 2024
For
Jan 11, 2024
Having an off-boarding mechanism in place for projects is a much-needed structure, and with careful evaluation of the off-boarding process, DAOStewards vote in favor of this proposal.
Jan 11, 2024
For
Jan 11, 2024
We love it. The research and principles are solid. Our only concern is that the funding terms are not agreed upon with TTO yet. That being said, we voted to approve because these are the exact issues DeSci is trying to flush out. Maybe a blueprint will come from this project.
Jan 9, 2024
For
Jan 9, 2024
Establishing the Procurement Committee adds a needed layer of structure to the ArbitrumDAO. DAOStewards vote in favor of this proposal.
Jan 25, 2024
For
Jan 25, 2024
Sighting the potential risk of removing the lower threshold, DAOStewards votes to increase the multi-sig threshold to 9/12 as this is a more straightforward approach to tackling the Stage requirement
Dec 12, 2023
Against
The initial proposal, VDP-5, lacked some information, and that made the ask for the Phase II funds somewhat unclear. We voted against this proposal.
Dec 11, 2023
For
With key questions on the compensation structure and KPIs answered, DAOStewards voted in favor of this proposal
Nov 29, 2023
For
Exercise has been promising for several diseases. It helps blood to flow and for your liver to degrade all the junk in the blood. Of course, it would help with longevity too. It might be worth a shot to mimic this with a molecule but we would still recommend exercise too.
Nov 26, 2023
For
With all the indelible marks Laurence already left in and outside of VitaDAO, he has the track record needed to make this role a success.
Nov 25, 2023
For
Fostering more onsight collaboration is much needed in our space. With an opportunity for contributors to work together for two months, we are sure to see more projects spurn up
Nov 24, 2023
For
DAOStewards voted in favor of this proposal. Lead Candidate for Osteoarthritis (OA) — RMD1101 — is positioned as a regenerative therapy for age-related degenerative pathologies, and this aligns with Vita’s longevity goals.
Dec 14, 2023
For
We voted in favor of incentivizing delegates for their participation in the ArbitrumDAO. We have been in a few communities that implemented this and have seen how such programs foster more active participation, bringing in newer contributors in the process.
Dec 9, 2023
Extend for both
After reviewing the proposal, and sighting the extreme variations in KYC timing and inappropriate timing for the backfund STIPs, it only made sense to extend the deadline.
Mar 7, 2024
For
Mar 7, 2024
DAOStewards are in favor of this proposal.
We appreciate the work PL has been doing; drafting the 1B(ridge) proposal to address delegates' concerns is great.
Having the board in place is a no-brainer as it provides that additional oversight. There was other notable feedback from delegates during meetings and it is good to see PL implement them in this 1B (ridge) proposal.
Also, to further reiterate one of the suggestions from @immuteablelawyer, a compensation structure for the board is nice to have and will foster better commitment. Looking forward to more documentation from the team and the success of this initiative.
Dec 18, 2023
Abstained
We abstained and then voted from lowest to highest. If the ARDC should be implemented, we should start with the lowest possible cost iteration, and see how that turns out before pushing to scale.
Dec 4, 2023
For
We were in support of the changes and upgrades to the Arbitrum chain seeing they have been audited.
Nov 18, 2023
Against
We believe the timing of this proposal was all wrong. It should have been included when the STIP was live rather than coming as a stand-alone proposal.
Nov 14, 2023
Against
We were not in support of this proposal. We would have preferred to see how the projects that already received STIP funds perform before sending out more funds.
Nov 10, 2023
Abstain
The concept behind the Arbitrum coalition is great and needed. However, prior to L2BEAT stepping down as DAO Advocate, there were centralization concerns, and thus DAOStewards voted to abstain.
Nov 9, 2023
For
Creating a framework for security proposals is good. It brings structure and leaves room for various high-quality security providers to interact with the ArbitrumDAO.
Nov 9, 2023
Against
Was discontinued with talks about the procurement framework in motion
Nov 6, 2023
Against & Lowest Amount
Funding initiatives that drive user engagement, and directly contribute to ecosystem growth will be a better way to manage the funds requested for the staking rewards.
Oct 31, 2023
Against
With Rabbithole and Galxe — both set to receive STIP funding — offering services that overlap, I see little to no reason to go ahead with this proposal. DAOStewards vote against this proposal.
Dec 4, 2023
For
Dec 4, 2023
For
Nov 15, 2023
Michael Vander Meiden, Katie Garcia, Moneymandoug, GFX and MattL
Nov 15, 2023
Gonna, Jack Anarok, Ethernaut, mastermojo, kaereste
Nov 15, 2023
Oxytocin, Axel, Teresacd, Juankbell and Juanbub_PGov
Nov 15, 2023
For
Nov 15, 2023
Ocandocrypto, Mmurthy, Raho, LauNaMu and v3naru_Curla
Nov 15, 2023
For
Nov 15, 2023
For
Oct 30, 2023
Abstain
Rewarding early contributions is always good but without clear documentation of who these Arbiters are and most (if not all) of their contributions, DAOStewards vote to abstain.
Oct 23, 2023
Against
Minting an additional 10% takes the total mint to 50%. This has the potential of causing market instability, risking the interests of existing token holders.
Oct 5, 2023
For
With promising preliminary results in increasing muscle mass, reducing senescent cells, and ablating adipocytes in animal studies, Oisín has shown potential in addressing age-related conditions. DAOStewards are in favor of this proposal.
Oct 19, 2023
For
Oct 19, 2023
For
Oct 19, 2023
For
Oct 19, 2023
For
Oct 19, 2023
For
Oct 12, 2023
Oct 19, 2023
Against
Oct 12, 2023
Intentional doxing for the purpose of whistleblowing should receive whistleblower immunity/protection
Jul 6, 2023
Proposal 4A, Proposal 4B, Proposal 4C, Proposal 4D, Proposal 4G, Proposal 4H, Proposal 4K
Jul 6, 2023
Oct 9, 2023
For
This empowers the DAO by accelerating network growth, fostering innovation, and gathering valuable data. The program ensures accountability and governance while supporting the Arbitrum ecosystem's expansion.
Oct 2, 2023
Wasn’t a for/against thing
Incentivizing users and builders, evolving governance capabilities, and gas fee optimization — our top three statements we believe will definitely help Arbitrum scale.
Sep 29, 2023
For
DAOStewards are all in for education and with a good look at the team putting all this together, we give this proposal a solid yes vote.
Sep 26, 2023
For
VitaDAO’s mission to accelerate research and development in the longevity space and the extension of human life and health-span aligns with the goals mentioned in the VDP-118 proposal, which aims to address age-related diseases and extend human health-span.
Sep 21, 2023
Matt_StableLab
Stable Lab is a large delegate in severl DAOs and their robust experience gives us confidence in their abilities
Sep 8, 2023
For
Approving this proposal empowers the Member Services Squad to enhance value for VitaDAO contributors, offering discounts and services, and launching the Member Services portal.
Sep 8, 2023
For
The Ambassador Program aligns with VitaDAO’s strategic goals, empowers local communities, and increases awareness while remaining budget-friendly.