freiheit#6901
Detailed thoughts on how you would solve these two problem spaces
Three key factors I would use to help the community respect a permissionless way of working, without having "free-riders" or poor quality of work:
a) peer to peer evaluation
b) reputation at stake
c) randomness
Corporations (and even non-profit organizations) often end up being organized with a top-down approach where people at the top have more skin in the game. This doesn't happen necessarily for ideologic reasons, more often it's just an organization framework that is not easily exploitable by bad actors, and so it works.
To have an horizontal, or bottom up approach that works we need to have:
a) skin in the game for people that is taking decisions
b) reputation of people that is taking decisions
c) randomness, to avoid having to double check every economic action, but having the possibility to check just "some" action.
An example of "proof of concept" in this direction (imagined for a small community) is the work I did for my dOrg application some month ago, that can be seen at this link:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1wS_KcIhBDZYOeELOUCE7RefT3L9Gt9GWQSIxzIHJBkQ/edit?usp=sharing
Sponsor(s)
Let's just see if I can help, not gonna shill myself at this stage :D
Other obligations during Season 3
I work as a PM for dOrg, currently around 10 hours per week.
For the rest of my time In studying organizations, decentralization, web3 and psychology.
In particular, I follow closely 1Hive, BrightIT, GIVeth, Aavegotchi and of course Bankless.
Qualifications
Game Theory expert, been a professional poker player for 10 years.
Managed a big poker staking school, designing the incentive and mechanism design to align incentives among a community of few hundreds of players.
Product Manager with project management expertise.
Reason for Applying
I am a web3 project manager at dOrg, I am working at improving our internal DAO operations and our mechanism design.
It would be great to help Bankless improve it's Governance Solutions!